Karen K. Lindfors, John M. Boone, Thomas R. Nelson, Kai Yang, Alexander L. C. Kwan, and DeWitt F. Miller
Radiology 2008;246 725-733
link
Masses are significantly more conspicuous on breast CT images compared with screen-film mammograms, but microcalcification lesions are not as well visualized on our early-generation dedicated breast CT images
Friday, 29 February 2008
Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice
Part I. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications
Christiane K. Kuhl, Frank Traber, and Hans H. Schild
Radiology 2008;246 675-696
link
The higher signal-to-noise ratio at 3.0 T is clearly advantageous and the increased radiofrequency absorption in tissues at higher field strengths is disadvantageous. All other effects, however, can be both advantageous or disadvantageous, depending on the desired image contrast and/or the intended clinical application.
Christiane K. Kuhl, Frank Traber, and Hans H. Schild
Radiology 2008;246 675-696
link
The higher signal-to-noise ratio at 3.0 T is clearly advantageous and the increased radiofrequency absorption in tissues at higher field strengths is disadvantageous. All other effects, however, can be both advantageous or disadvantageous, depending on the desired image contrast and/or the intended clinical application.
Friday, 8 February 2008
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital versus Film Mammography
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital versus Film Mammography: Exploratory Analysis of Selected Population Subgroups in DMIST
Etta D. Pisano, R. Edward Hendrick, Martin J. Yaffe, Janet K. Baum, Suddhasatta Acharyya, Jean B. Cormack, Lucy A. Hanna, Emily F. Conant, Laurie L. Fajardo, Lawrence W. Bassett, Carl J. D'Orsi, Roberta A. Jong, Murray Rebner, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Constantine A. Gatsonis For the DMIST Investigators Group
Radiology 2008;246 376-383
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/246/2/376?etoc
The results reported here corroborate the trend in favor of improved diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography over film for pre- and perimenopausal women younger than 50 years with dense breasts
Etta D. Pisano, R. Edward Hendrick, Martin J. Yaffe, Janet K. Baum, Suddhasatta Acharyya, Jean B. Cormack, Lucy A. Hanna, Emily F. Conant, Laurie L. Fajardo, Lawrence W. Bassett, Carl J. D'Orsi, Roberta A. Jong, Murray Rebner, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Constantine A. Gatsonis For the DMIST Investigators Group
Radiology 2008;246 376-383
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/246/2/376?etoc
The results reported here corroborate the trend in favor of improved diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography over film for pre- and perimenopausal women younger than 50 years with dense breasts
Labels:
diagnostic accuracy,
DMIST,
population subgroups
Estrogen Receptor-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer: Imaging Features
Estrogen Receptor-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer: Imaging Features of Tumors with and without Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2 Over-expression
Yingbing Wang, Debra M. Ikeda, Balasubramanian Narasimhan, Teri A.Longacre, Richard J. Bleicher, Sunita Pal, Roger J. Jackman, and Stefanie S. Jeffrey
Radiology 2008;246 367-375
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/246/2/367?etoc
We found that lesion margin and presence of calcifications on images, as well as cancer stage at diagnosis, are significantly associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 status in patients with estrogen receptor negative breast cancer
Yingbing Wang, Debra M. Ikeda, Balasubramanian Narasimhan, Teri A.Longacre, Richard J. Bleicher, Sunita Pal, Roger J. Jackman, and Stefanie S. Jeffrey
Radiology 2008;246 367-375
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/246/2/367?etoc
We found that lesion margin and presence of calcifications on images, as well as cancer stage at diagnosis, are significantly associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 status in patients with estrogen receptor negative breast cancer
Thursday, 17 January 2008
Axillary Lymph Nodes: US-guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Initial Staging of Breast Cancer Correlation with Primary Tumor Size
Susan L. Koelliker, Maureen A. Chung, Martha B. Mainiero, Margaret M. Steinhoff, and Blake Cady
Radiology 2007;246 81-89
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/246/1/81?etoc
US-guided fine-needle aspiration is useful in the initial axillary staging of breast cancer; the sensitivity of the technique increases with increasing tumor size
Radiology 2007;246 81-89
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/246/1/81?etoc
US-guided fine-needle aspiration is useful in the initial axillary staging of breast cancer; the sensitivity of the technique increases with increasing tumor size
Labels:
axillary staging,
breast cancer,
initial staging,
US
Computer-aided Detection in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Sensitivity and Reproducibility in Serial Examinations
Seung Ja Kim, Woo Kyung Moon, Nariya Cho, Joo Hee Cha, Sun Mi Kim, and Jung-Gi Im
Radiology 2007;246 71-80
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/246/1/71?etoc
When a computer-aided detection system was applied to initial and short-term follow-up digital mammograms, sensitivities were, respectively, 91% and 89% for masses and 100% and 100% for microcalcifications; overall false-positive mark rates were 0.29 mark per image and 0.27 mark per image at initial and follow-up digital mammography, respectively
Radiology 2007;246 71-80
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/246/1/71?etoc
When a computer-aided detection system was applied to initial and short-term follow-up digital mammograms, sensitivities were, respectively, 91% and 89% for masses and 100% and 100% for microcalcifications; overall false-positive mark rates were 0.29 mark per image and 0.27 mark per image at initial and follow-up digital mammography, respectively
Mammographic, US, and MR Imaging Phenotypes of Familial Breast Cancer
Simone Schrading and Christiane K. Kuhl
Radiology 2008;246 58-70
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/246/1/58?etoc
Based on the results obtained in our cohort, we propose that this relatively low sensitivity of MR imaging in women at increased familial risk is due to the fact that these cancers may exhibit unusual imaging features also in breast MR imaging
Radiology 2008;246 58-70
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/246/1/58?etoc
Based on the results obtained in our cohort, we propose that this relatively low sensitivity of MR imaging in women at increased familial risk is due to the fact that these cancers may exhibit unusual imaging features also in breast MR imaging
Labels:
breast,
familial breast cancer,
high risk,
MR,
MRI
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)