Showing posts with label breast imaging. Show all posts
Showing posts with label breast imaging. Show all posts

Wednesday, 2 March 2011

Breast Cancer: Early and Late Fluorescence Near-Infrared Imaging with Indocyanine Green: A Preliminary Study

Breast Cancer: Early and Late Fluorescence Near-Infrared Imaging with Indocyanine Green: A Preliminary Study
Alexander Poellinger, Susen Burock, Dirk Grosenick, Axel Hagen, Lutz Ludemann, Felix Diekmann, Florian Engelken, Rainer Macdonald, Herbert Rinneberg, and Peter-Michael Schlag
Radiology 2011; 258 409-416

Link to Journal

By capitalizing on the extravasation of indocyanine green (ICG) through the wall of tumorous vessels and consequently using late-fluorescence mammograms, we were able to achieve far more pronounced contrast between the tumorous and healthy background tissue (mean contrast value, 0.64) compared with this contrast on images acquired during or shortly after the administration of ICG (mean contrast value, 0.25)

Combined Optical and X-ray Tomosynthesis Breast Imaging

Combined Optical and X-ray Tomosynthesis Breast Imaging
Qianqian Fang, Juliette Selb, Stefan A. Carp, Gregory Boverman, Eric L. Miller, Dana H. Brooks, Richard H. Moore, Daniel B. Kopans, and David A. Boas
Radiology 2011; 258 89-97

Link to Journal

Co-registered functional and structural image overlays demonstrate a significant difference in total hemoglobin concentration contrast between malignant tumors and solid benign lesions

Wednesday, 23 December 2009

Variability in Interpretive Performance at Screening Mammography and Radiologists' Characteristics Associated with Accuracy

Variability in Interpretive Performance at Screening Mammography and Radiologists' Characteristics Associated with Accuracy
Joann G. Elmore, Sara L. Jackson, Linn Abraham, Diana L. Miglioretti, Patricia A. Carney, Berta M. Geller, Bonnie C. Yankaskas, Karla Kerlikowske, Tracy Onega, Robert D. Rosenberg, Edward A. Sickles, and Diana S. M. Buist
Radiology 2009;253 641-651

Link to Journal

Fellowship training in breast imaging was the only radiologists' characteristic significantly associated with greater sensitivity and higher overall accuracy; however, fellowship-trained radiologists also had significantly higher false-positive rates