PET/CT for Monitoring Therapy Response in Breast Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases
Mohsen Beheshti, Werner Langsteger, and Ukihide Tateishi
Radiology 2008;249 389-390
Link to Journal
Letter to editor
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Author
- Dr Chris Flowers
- Tampa, Florida, United States
- Cancer Imaging Advisers Tampa, FL Previously - Director of Breast Imaging and Research at Moffitt Cancer Center. Associate Professor of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging University of California, San Francisco UCSF
Labels
- 14G core biopsy (2)
- 3T (1)
- accuracy (3)
- ACRIN 6666 (1)
- ADH (1)
- adherence to recall (1)
- adverse effects (1)
- angiogenesis (1)
- arterial calcifications (1)
- assessment (2)
- assessment of response (1)
- asymmetries (2)
- axilla (1)
- axillary staging (3)
- BCSC (1)
- benign (1)
- benign biopsy (1)
- biopsy (3)
- BIRADS (3)
- BIRADS 3 (3)
- breast (5)
- breast biopsy (2)
- breast cancer (15)
- breast cancer surgery (2)
- breast CT (2)
- breast density (2)
- breast imaging (3)
- breast irradiation (1)
- breast MRI (12)
- breast screening (9)
- breast specific gamma imaging (1)
- breast ultrasound (4)
- CA153 (1)
- CAD (13)
- CADET (1)
- calcifications (4)
- cancer detection (1)
- CEA (1)
- cell based contour grouping (1)
- CHD (1)
- chemotherapy response (3)
- clinic setting (1)
- Comparative effectiveness (1)
- comparison (1)
- compression (1)
- computer aided detection (1)
- computer-aided diagnosis algorithm (1)
- concordance (2)
- contoversies (1)
- contrast (2)
- controversies (4)
- DBT (1)
- DCIS (2)
- December (2)
- dense breasts (1)
- density (1)
- diagnostic accuracy (5)
- diagnostic mammograms (6)
- diffusion weighted imaging (1)
- diffusion weighted MRI (1)
- digital mammography (3)
- discomfort (1)
- DMIST (4)
- Doppler (1)
- double reading (1)
- dual headed (1)
- DW (1)
- DWI (2)
- E-cadherin (1)
- early stage (1)
- econvolution (1)
- enhancement (1)
- enhancing lesions (1)
- ethnicity (1)
- false positive biopsy (1)
- familial breast cancer (1)
- fat columns (1)
- fellowship training (2)
- FFDM (3)
- Film reading (1)
- fluorescence (1)
- fluorophore (1)
- FNAC (1)
- gadobenate (1)
- galactography (2)
- gamma imaging (1)
- guidelines (2)
- HER 2 (1)
- HER2 +ve (1)
- high risk (3)
- imaging (1)
- imaging findings (1)
- imaging follow up (2)
- improved diagnosis (1)
- improved image contrast with digital (2)
- Indeterminate (1)
- induced breast cancer (1)
- initial staging (1)
- interpretaive performance (1)
- interpretation time (1)
- interval cancers screening review (2)
- lab rats (1)
- laboratory (1)
- Lexicon (1)
- lidocaine (1)
- LN metastasis (1)
- lobular (1)
- localization (1)
- low risk lesions (1)
- Lymph nodes (2)
- Lymphoma (1)
- malignant (1)
- mammography (14)
- Mammosite (1)
- mass density (1)
- masses (4)
- menstrual cycle (1)
- microcalcification (1)
- monte carlo study (1)
- MR (3)
- MRI (17)
- national mammography database (1)
- neeoadjuvant chemo (3)
- Neoadjuvant (5)
- NHSBSP (1)
- NIR (2)
- NMD (1)
- non-participation (1)
- normalized ADC assessment (1)
- October 2007 (4)
- open magnet (1)
- optical imaging (4)
- osteopontin (1)
- papilloma (1)
- pathology (1)
- patient perceptions (1)
- PEM (1)
- Performance (6)
- PET/CT (1)
- population subgroups (1)
- pores (1)
- predictor (1)
- Preoperative diagnosis (1)
- Probably Benign (1)
- Quantitative analysis (1)
- radiation (2)
- radiofrequency ablation (1)
- Radiologist analysis (2)
- radiologist performance (3)
- reader studies (1)
- recall (1)
- recall rates (2)
- recurrence (1)
- reproducibility (1)
- residency (1)
- residual disease (1)
- ROC curves (1)
- screen film vs digital (1)
- screening (5)
- Screening mammography (10)
- SENSITIVITY (1)
- September 2007 (4)
- SFM (1)
- short term follow up (1)
- similar images (1)
- single call cancers (1)
- soft copy (1)
- staging (1)
- Stereotactic core biopsy (1)
- Stress (1)
- surgical planning (1)
- susceptibility weighted MRI (1)
- technical considerations (1)
- therapy (1)
- tomosynthesis (3)
- TRAM flaps (1)
- triple negative cancer (1)
- tumor blood flow (1)
- tumor response (1)
- tumor volume (2)
- UCSF (2)
- UK (1)
- ultrasound mass strain imaging (1)
- underestimation (1)
- upgrade (1)
- US (6)
- us guidance (1)
- USPSTF (1)
- variation (1)
- waiting for results (1)
No comments:
Post a Comment